Why I Wish Rick Nash Were On A Different Team, And That’s Allowed
I’ve been on the receiving end of a fairly decent twitter-drubbing from Columbus Blue Jackets fans about a few Rick Nash tweets I made yesterday, especially about the comment that he’s “drowning” in Columbus. Which was a little much, maybe.
The intent was to praise Nash, not take pot-shots at CBJ, but I can fully understand why fans didn’t appreciate the barbs. For what it’s worth Jackets fans, if you follow me with any regularity, you’re well aware I’m consistent in my criticisms - my own favourite team (the Islanders) has been far from sarcasm-exempt on this blog and twitter.
That should probably make it hurt more, because it points to the fact that I’m usually without bias with those comments, meaning I wasn’t just taking pot shots without a point.
Let me explain myself:
I hate that Rick Nash plays for the Blue Jackets, because the majority of North America doesn’t care about the Blue Jackets. Ohio is a great hockey state, and there seems to be plenty of proud, smart fans of the team. But outside of that region, the national interest isn’t there. It’s in Original Six teams, Washington, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia and so on.
Thus, when games are televised in primetime, or the Winter Classic teams are selected, Columbus is nowhere near to getting a second thought about being picked. I know that hurts, and believe me, I can relate to that misery, but denying it is just silly fan bias thinking. In turn, I never get (nobody ever gets, actually) to see Nash play unless they have the NHL package or they live in Ohio.
I do have the package, but again, I’m just not that interested in Columbus as a team, so it’s not worth watching the games all that often just to watch one player. (Unless Lebron is playing. I’d tooootally tune in just to watch him. ….Oops, sorry Ohio
)
Beyond that, I’m frustrated for him because he should be one of the top few names mentioned when someone talks about the best players in the game. If he played for the Maple Leafs or the Red Wings, best believe that would be the case. He’s just out of the national spotlight there.
It’s even more endearing that he’s so loyal about staying there, given that he’s aware of all the things I’ve written above. And better still, you know he believes they can win a Cup there in Columbus the way Carolina did in 2006.
And maybe they can.
But in playing for a team that doesn’t spend to bring in supporting talent, for one that instead shrewdly thrifts together a pretty good squad year after year, it greatly minimizes his Cup-winning odds. Yes, the odd team in history has gotten it done without spending a ton, but it’s a rarity. The playoffs are a long, tough grind that requires secondary scoring, tremendous defense and great goaltending. While possible, it’s tough (and rare) to acquire the whole package on a budget.
What that means then, is that a player who can do so much and be so great will swim upstream against the current until he’s forced to do the inevitable Ray Bourque-to-Colorado thing, and it may not work out. A guy who could have a massive effect on a Stanley Cup Final may never get the chance to live out a defining moment.
Like I said, more power to the guy for being willing to battle for that city, but as a fan of the game, I think I’m allowed to wish he were on a different team.
And something else to remember: just because I want him to go to a different team doesn’t mean that’s happening, like I’m the GM or something. A lot of the responses I got from Blue Jackets supporters were along the lines of “just let us keep him,” or panicky-sounding, frenzied keyboard mashing, like when you take a baby’s favourite stuffy away.
@akrygier — @jtbourne is the sarah palin of hockey writing, who cares what he thinks.
Uh…..fair enough, I guess?
The moral of the story is this: I’m sure Columbus fans wish, say…. I dunno, Shea Weber or some other stud in a small market like that were on the Penguins. He’s a great talent you’d like to see in primetime more, you’d like to see in the Winter Classic, you’d like to see in the late rounds of playoffs on a fully-funded team trying to win Cups, as opposed to a team that squeaks into playoffs and makes a first round exit.
It’s not gonna happen, of course, but from a fan’s standpoint, and the standpoint of the history of hockey, I feel like Nash is a diamond, locked in a safety deposit box for no one to see.
But Ohio, it’s your safety deposit box, and you get to see him plenty over the course of the season. So, enjoy him, root for him, and hopefully he can bring you that Carolina-esque Cup your fans deserve. But don’t hate on me because I want to have a peek at the stone once in awhile too.
Oh, and *ahem* …..sorry for the term “drowning.” ‘Twas a bit much.
Happy humpday, folks.
NHL Standings Chat
Happy Monday morning, friends! Hope you had a good weekend – it was a beauty in PHX, minus my double bogey on 18. More on that tomorrow..
*****
NHL standings talk! First, the West:
|
LEGEND ›
|
| DIV | GP | W | L | OT | Pts | GF | GA | DIFF | Home | Away | L10 | Streak | ||
| 1 | CEN | 71 | 45 | 19 | 7 | 97 | 234 | 179 | +55 | 26-7-3 | 19-12-4 | 4-4-2 | ||
| 2 |
* - Phoenix Coyotes
|
PAC | 73 | 46 | 22 | 5 | 97 | 201 | 179 | +22 | 26-10-2 | 20-12-3 | 9-1-0 | Won 9 |
| 3 | NW | 72 | 44 | 24 | 4 | 92 | 236 | 187 | +49 | 26-8-2 | 18-16-2 | 6-2-2 | ||
| 4 | PAC | 72 | 43 | 19 | 10 | 96 | 232 | 192 | +40 | 22-6-8 | 21-13-2 | 3-6-1 | Lost 5 | |
| 5 | CEN | 73 | 42 | 26 | 5 | 89 | 206 | 203 | +3 | 21-12-2 | 21-14-3 | 7-3-0 | Won 6 | |
| 6 | PAC | 70 | 41 | 24 | 5 | 87 | 207 | 185 | +22 | 20-12-3 | 21-12-2 | 5-4-1 | Won 1 | |
| 7 | NW | 71 | 40 | 25 | 6 | 86 | 213 | 190 | +23 | 22-11-2 | 18-14-4 | 5-5-0 | Lost 2 | |
| 8 | CEN | 71 | 35 | 23 | 13 | 83 | 193 | 192 | +1 | 19-10-5 | 16-13-8 | 7-2-1 | Won 1 | |
| 9 | NW | 72 | 36 | 27 | 9 | 81 | 184 | 181 | +3 | 18-16-3 | 18-11-6 | 6-4-0 | Lost 1 | |
| 10 | CEN | 72 | 34 | 29 | 9 | 77 | 196 | 199 | -3 | 12-18-5 | 22-11-4 | 6-4-0 | Lost 1 | |
| 11 | PAC | 71 | 34 | 29 | 8 | 76 | 203 | 217 | -14 | 23-11-3 | 11-18-5 | 5-4-1 | Won 4 | |
| 12 | NW | 72 | 35 | 31 | 6 | 76 | 198 | 211 | -13 | 24-9-3 | 11-22-3 | 4-4-2 | Won 1 | |
| 13 | PAC | 72 | 31 | 27 | 14 | 76 | 208 | 230 | -22 | 20-10-7 | 11-17-7 | 3-5-2 | ||
| 14 | CEN | 72 | 29 | 31 | 12 | 70 | 187 | 229 | -42 | 18-11-7 | 11-20-5 | 4-3-3 | ||
| 15 | NW | 72 | 23 | 42 | 7 | 53 | 184 | 248 | -64 | 15-18-4 | 8-24-3 | 4-5-1 | Won 2 | |
Since none of us believe that Detroit is going to miss the playoffs – y’know, cause they aren’t going to – the real number for Calgary, St. Louis, Anaheim, Minnesota and Dallas to shoot for is the Avalanche’s 86 – ten points ahead with ten games to go. We could very well be looking at the exact same teams above the cutoff line ten games from now. In fact, I think we will be.
Because of that, this is the first year I’m thinking more about the playoff seeding of our eight qualifiers than who they actually are.
For San Jose, the best thing that could happen to their Cup chances would be to finish fourth, and play at least one of the “happy to make it this far” teams – that being Los Angeles, Nashville, and Colorado. All three of those teams were predicted to miss the playoffs at the start of the season, and when contrasted to their expectations, I think they’d be far more likely to roll over and die (or better put, be too content with their over-achieving regular seasons) than, well, any of the other four opponents in the West.
Will Phoenix finish above San Jose? It’s gonna be close – Phoenix has a tough road ahead with six of their last nine on the road (road gmes: Chicago, Nashville, Vancouver, Calgary, Los Angeles and San Jose), but I’ve finally learned my lesson on betting against them. The best part, as demonstrated in parantheses above, is that the last game of the year is San Jose versus Phoenix, and it could very well have huge who-plays-who implications.
As for the East….
|
LEGEND ›
|
| DIV | GP | W | L | OT | Pts | GF | GA | DIFF | Home | Away | L10 | Streak | ||
| 1 | SE | 72 | 48 | 14 | 10 | 106 | 283 | 203 | +80 | 26-4-4 | 22-10-6 | 7-1-2 | Won 1 | |
| 2 | ATL | 72 | 42 | 24 | 6 | 90 | 224 | 205 | +19 | 21-10-4 | 21-14-2 | 6-2-2 | ||
| 3 |
* - Buffalo Sabres
|
NE | 71 | 39 | 22 | 10 | 88 | 200 | 180 | +20 | 21-9-6 | 18-13-4 | 6-3-1 | Won 3 |
| 4 | ATL | 71 | 42 | 25 | 4 | 88 | 189 | 169 | +20 | 24-10-1 | 18-15-3 | 5-4-1 | Lost 1 | |
| 5 | NE | 72 | 37 | 30 | 5 | 79 | 194 | 212 | -18 | 23-10-4 | 14-20-1 | 2-7-1 | Lost 5 | |
| 6 | ATL | 72 | 37 | 30 | 5 | 79 | 212 | 199 | +13 | 21-13-2 | 16-17-3 | 4-4-2 | Lost 2 | |
| 7 | NE | 72 | 36 | 29 | 7 | 79 | 196 | 198 | -2 | 18-13-4 | 18-16-3 | 7-2-1 | ||
| 8 | NE | 71 | 32 | 27 | 12 | 76 | 176 | 181 | -5 | 15-14-6 | 17-13-6 | 5-4-1 | Won 1 | |
| 9 | SE | 72 | 32 | 29 | 11 | 75 | 218 | 230 | -12 | 18-13-5 | 14-16-6 | 4-5-1 | Won 4 | |
| 10 | ATL | 72 | 31 | 32 | 9 | 71 | 186 | 197 | -11 | 15-17-6 | 16-15-3 | 3-5-2 | Lost 3 | |
| 11 | SE | 71 | 29 | 31 | 11 | 69 | 186 | 209 | -23 | 15-13-8 | 14-18-3 | 5-4-1 | Won 1 | |
| 12 | SE | 72 | 30 | 34 | 8 | 68 | 201 | 226 | -25 | 19-15-3 | 11-19-5 | 5-4-1 | Lost 1 | |
| 13 | ATL | 72 | 29 | 33 | 10 | 68 | 189 | 222 | -33 | 19-13-3 | 10-20-7 | 4-4-2 | Lost 1 | |
| 14 | SE | 72 | 28 | 32 | 12 | 68 | 188 | 225 | -37 | 18-12-6 | 10-20-6 | 2-7-1 | Lost 5 | |
| 15 | NE | 72 | 26 | 34 | 12 | 64 | 192 | 238 | -46 | 16-14-5 | 10-20-7 | 7-2-1 | Won 3 | |
A few things surprise me:
1) To teams on the bubble that have been trying to crack playoffs and be taken seriously for years (Atlanta, Tampa Bay, Florida…. okay, you too, New York teams): How bad do you need the other teams to be? They’ve done everything they can this year to lose and fail. Perennial playoff teams like Boston and Philly CANNOT be any worse than they’ve been. At some point, you’re gonna have to grab the bull by the horns and win some big games. To quote Floyd Mayweather, “step ya game up”.
2) As far as I know, neither Boston or Montreal has played consecutive good games this year. I’m amazed they’re in 7th and 8th. And poor Philly – better than Buffalo at every position, if you entirely ignore the fact that they have to play with AHL goalies. AGAIN.
Yep. Poor, poor Philly.
3) The crazy divide between the top four teams and the bottom four in the East is weird – it basically means the top four teams get a first round bye, which is nice in the NHL playoff marathon. The only team I’m not fully sold on that’s up there is Buffalo, simply because if Miller has a couple bad games, they can be beaten. Actually, y’know what might be fun? A Philly/Buffalo playoff series where Philly beats Buffalo like a drum for 50 of the 60 minutes every game, and loses 3-2 and 2-1 four straight times (after Biron Eche Cechmanek Boucher lets in a few soft ones).
*****
Kudos to Teemu Selanne for scoring 600 goals…. crazy that I’m old enough to remember his amazing rookie year.
*****
Even crazier? Kudos to ME for crawling from 16th out of the Bourne’s Blog Hockey League 20-team alley-fight (yes, that’s even crazier than Selanne’s 600 NHL goals, apparently), and climbing into a playoff spot the last week of the year. I chipped all the way up to seventh, and it’s a new season kiddies, look out!
Only five more days til Friday. And only a few more pounds til I go on Drew Magary’s twitter public humiliation diet. Dude is down 45 pounds so far.
“Phaneuf” Sounds Onomatopoeic
Really, the title has nothing to do with anything. Just an observation, reallly. That’s the sound you make when you get hit by him, maybe. “Ph-neuf!”
Because today is gonna be sooo fun, lets start with huge news from the hockey world:
*****
So yeah, good morning!
The Toronto Maple Leafs are the best team ever of all-time and they’re gonna win the Cup, right? Big time.
I see no need for any further review.
Okay, just a little: I thought it was awesome that Phaneuf fought in his first period. If you’re Dion, you know it’s all eyez on you in that first period, so what better way to show you’re committed to being a Leaf than to have a go with Colin White? Every time I ever fought it took a period-plus of self-convincing that I needed to do it (with the odd sticking-up-for-a-teammate skirmish, of course). Phaneuf clearly needed less time. He just seems like a Maple Leaf.
*****
Dion has gone from the Western Conference to the East, and I found myself thinking about how cool that would be. Playing in new cities, cities like New York, Philadelphia, Boston, all those old-school east coast cities (Raleigh-Durham!).
Which leads to the question: which would be the better conference to play in? They both have their warm cities (Phoenix & San Jose vs. Tampa Bay & “Sunrise” (Panthers), they both have their Canadian cities (Toronto, Ottawa & Montreal vs. Vancouver, Calgary & Edmonton), and they both win their share of Cups. What’s your vote?
*****
You know what always surprises me? How different players hold their stick with their top hand. It’s something you just assume everyone does the same, but they totally don’t. And, it makes a huge difference in the things you can do with a stick and puck.
I assume most new players just grab the stick and go, and don’t give it another thought, which is how you should decide what you like. But a good rule of thumb is, if you’re “choking up” on the stick with your top hand, you probably aren’t a great player. Sorry.
Some guys jam the butt-end of their stick into their palm (I’m not even gonna try to make that sound more appropriate, you’re an adult. Stop it), like, completely perpendicular to it. I’m somewhere in the middle. My palm wraps around the very top like a claw, but the rest of my fingers wrap around pretty normal. You’ll find the real handsy guys have their palm and stick in that 90 degree-angle-claw hold (90 degrees is an exaggeration, they obviously have to have some fingers wrapped around, but the butt-end will be jammed into the palm), while guys with hard shots and simpler games just grab the damn thing like they’re holding on to a railing, and fire when ready. Those guys (d-men, usually) have no idea what I’m talking about right now.
I’m guessing how you hold the top of your stick hasn’t crossed your mind all that often? I probably just did the classic golf jinx to like, 400 people. “Do you inhale or exhale when you swing?”
*****
Happy Humpday folks. I hope the Lost premier was as good as EVERY PERSON ON FACEBOOK EVER hoped it was.
Stanley Cup Frontrunners
Contributing to the Power Rankings for USA Today each couple weeks really makes me think about where teams in the NHL are at. These are the left-over thought nuggets from this weeks edition.
*****
Carolina - In last years playoffs, Bourne’s Blog became a forum for a quality back and forth with some of the Carolina faithful about their team (mostly because I was treating the ‘Canes like I’ve been treating Phoenix this year), and somewhere along the way I got convinced that they weren’t all that bad. It made sense that they wouldn’t be – Eric Staal is worthy of having a team built around him, Cam Ward is one of the best goalies in the NHL, and I thought Paul Maurice was a pretty good coach.
When we did our pre-season predictions, we got some static about the lack of Carolina love. I had debated whether or not to include them, but we were only asked to pick division and conference winners, not playoff teams, so it made no sense to mention them. Playoffs, yes, top team, no.
So what the f**k is going on down there?
And now the two players I mentioned before are hurt? They’re worse than my Isles? The Leafs? Hit that “comment” button ‘Canes fans. Explain yourselves.
*****
I can’t help but think that there’s about a 20% chance the Cup winner comes out of the Western Conference this year.
Who looks like a Cup threat right now? I mean, you can say the Colorado Avalanche, but you don’t mean that. You’re aware they’re still a “good young team”, right? It’s okay to say that they’re legit. Tons of up-and-coming talent. But I don’t see a whole lot of “crap, I don’t want to play that team in playoffs” on their roster. I do see a whole lot of “crap, I really don’t feel like playing this mid-season game, can someone get a leash on Wolski? Stastny? O’Reilly? Duchene? CAN SOMEONE GET A BELL ON DUCHENE!??”
Name another threat with a straight face right now.
The Sharks?
I’d agree, if they didn’t play in the the Pacific Division, or as it’s better known, the ”try-to-gage-a-team-in-a-division-with-LA-Phoenix-and-Dallas” group. Heatley was a massive pick-up. Fine. He makes them the West’s best hope until Chicago inevitably wakes from it’s slumber. But there’s still something that doesn’t feel right about calling the Sharks a Cup contender. What does it mean that when I picture the Pacific Division, I picture a train going over some old wooden tressel bridge, only nobody knows the wood is rotten beneath? I feel like every passing train (game?) is one closer to the utter collapse of the whole thing. Combine that with a history of playoff failure, and it’s hard to be too sold on the Teal Trainwrecks Titans.
I know you can only beat the teams you play (the Boise State football problem), it’s just tough to tell if they’re actually good, or playing bad opponents. But, they will be a top three seed again, so here’s to hoping that they can break the same mold they built.
How about this: If I were to say “for a thousand dollars, will the Stanley Cup come out of the Western Conference, or the Atlantic Division?” - which one are you picking?
Atlantic Division
| GP | W | L | OT | Pts | GF | GA | Home | Away | L10 | Streak | |
| 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 24 | 54 | 44 | 5-3-0 | 7-2-0 | 6-4-0 | Lost 2 | |
| 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 39 | 33 | 3-4-0 | 8-0-0 | 8-2-0 | Won 5 | |
| 18 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 21 | 56 | 48 | 6-2-0 | 4-5-1 | 3-6-1 | Lost 1 | |
| 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 52 | 37 | 6-2-1 | 3-2-0 | 6-3-1 | Won 4 | |
| 17 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 17 | 44 | 50 | 5-2-2 | 1-4-3 | 5-3-2 | Won 1 |
You know what I’d pick? I’d pick to complain that it’s NO WONDER THE ISLES STRUGGLE SO BAD.
This is what makes the NHL playoffs so great. It’s not accurate to gage a team based strictly on their record, since head-to-head is the only undeniable measuring stick for “who’s-better-than-who”. In the ever-popular BCS, strength of schedule is a heavy factory in determining the best teams. Fortunately for us, the NHL has a playoff format, so we actually get to watch the “I wonder who’s actually better” questions play out.
And who’s actually better?
The Stanley Cup Champion Penguins, my friend. That’s not just picking the obvious – at this point in the season, it’s picking correctly.
*****
And last, I wanted to give a shout-out to the reader who read my USA Today article, found my blog, tracked down my email, then wrote me the following email, which is printed below, unedited:
“you smoke pickle”
And so, I laughed.













I'm a hockey player turned writer. After playing for Alaska Anchorage in the WCHA (NCAA), I carried on with an NHL tryout (New York Islanders in 2007) before spending a couple seasons in the AHL/ECHL (last year was 2008-09). My father, Bob Bourne, won four Stanley Cups with the Islanders in the '80's, as did my fiancee's dad, Clark Gillies. I'm now the web editor for theScore's hockey blog "Backhand Shelf."