Toews, The Itty-Bitty Slapshot Committee, and Scott Gomez
During my first full year in the ECHL, I had the privilege of playing with Travis Rycroft, our team captain in Utah (for one of my better pieces, on Travis and team chemistry click here. I wrote it in my second month of blogging – you can tell because I don’t make every damn sentence it’s own paragraph like I do now – and it was good enough that I was inspired to keep doing this).
While I learned a lot about work ethic and character from the guy, I also picked up an infinitely valuable (and apparently common) trick from him that I’m sure many of you already use: When you go to the bar on a work night, always get the stamp on the underside of your wrist. That way, if it’s not washed off the next day, it still won’t be visible, and your boss/coach won’t get mad and make you start bag-skating/…collating?
Random bag skating tangent: Can we unify what we call doing the lines that go from goal line to blue to goal line to center to goal line… etc? Lightnight lines, suicides, ladders, whatever…. can we get on the same page here, my international friends? How about plain and simple “lines”? Suicides are on a basketball court, and we hardly need to tack “lightning” on to something that, by the end, moves like a slow motion replay.
I’m wandering big time here, but we used to do the “Peter Zezel” – which was basically that same set of lines, but after you went all the way down and came back, you had to go all the way down around the net and back to the blue line, then go back around the net to get back to the goal line. We had to the entire rink in that direction too before doing it all again on the way back. Guh.
Maybe it’s time to start this blog.
*****
Hey look, it’s a random thoughts catch-up post!
How about Jonathan Toews wearing #16 for team Canada at the Olympics, out of respect for the more senior Joe Thornton? In the Conference Finals, with the two going head to head, I couldn’t help feel like Toews finally surpassed Joe as the games current best #19. What is it about that number that attracts talented, respectful, likable stars? Steve Yzerman, Joe Sakic… Toews could fit right in that conversation at the end of his career.
*****
Recently-wrong friend-of-the-blog Ms. Conduct (Ms. C: Richards beat two d-men and a goalie to the puck, laid out just as aggressively, while your poor-decision-making Halak got plowed by Hamrlik, and Richards emerged from the smoke unscathed) called MA Bergeron “The Itty Bitty Slapshot Committee”, and I couldn’t love that assessment more. He’s like those toys that do a backflip when you wind ‘em up. You’re like “hey, neat!”, and after the fourth backflip it’s…”soooo, what else ya got?”
When Mike McKenna tweeted about him being like a field goal kicker – wait on the bench until it’s time to do your one job – I didn’t realize how accurate it would be. I mean, when Richards hit him he looked like a last-guy-back kicker trying to tackle Ed Reed or something.
{Random note: I should probably note he was one of the funniest, nicest guys at Islanders camp. Don’t get me wrong, I fully mean the stuff in the two paragraphs above, I just feel obligated to note he’s an all-around nice guy.}
*****
Okay, so think about Scott Gomez skating up-ice with the puck, and the hilarity that is people trying to hit him. Now imagine us in college watching him play on an Olympic sheet in the ECHL. One game I went to, he was running a powerplay, and literally stopped with the puck at his feet, stood up, and pointed with his glove for where guys should move to. One pass later, goal, Alaska Aces. Okay, you’re good, we get it. He only scored 13 times in the 61 games he played, but found time to get 73 assists. Man he’s deadly.
*****
I’ve often wanted to put polls in my blog, but couldn’t figure out how. And by “couldn’t figure out” I mean “didn’t try to figure it out”. I’ve got some columns to bust out, and four guys are on my radar for a story. Which would you most like to read? Also, anyone know of a good free poll site?
Dustin Byfuglien
Mike Richards
Matt Carle
Patrick Kane
*****
I wrote a piece on the Chicago Blackhawks and the phrase “41 thunderfuck” today for Puck Daddy (though I called it 41 thundertruck for their sake). When the article is up, I’ll put the link here. Happy Tuesday, and thanks for all the comments on skate sharpening. FBV apparently FTW, I guess, or something!
Cinqo de OhMyGod, He’s Not Wearing Teeth On TV
So, does Darren McCarty not have teeth, or does he just choose not to wear them? And as a follow up, which of those two things would be more messed up?
On the “doesn’t have them” hand, he’s just said eff it. I’m not doin’ the whole teeth thing. People know I played hockey, they know I was a tough, they don’t expect me to have any chompers. It’s a hassle, it’s expensive, I’m just not doin’ it. I don’t care if I’m an analyst with Versus. I’m not going through with it. (note: I actually like having him on the panel there. A little personality never hurt anyone.)
On the ”chooses not to wear them” hand, he’s completely socially oblivious. Because he knows enough to have the teeth, but doesn’t think TV is the right time to be wearing them. He’s gone through the whole procedure. Dentist appointments, fittings, root canals, who knows. But he deems national television an unworthy tooth-sporting event. I guess he didn’t think many people were gonna see him. After all, he is on Versus. BOOM! So if not then…. WHEN?
My best guess: He knows he looks better with them in, but they inhibit his ability to speak clearly. You know, without having a lisp or something. (Which probably just comes from getting your brain puchisized for free for a dozen+ years, but hey, I’m fine with blaming the teeth.)
{Random tooth tale: My college teammate got a new retainer-style front jib right before our road trip to Minneapolis. We went out that night after our game for his 21st birthday. Gets cross-eyed drunk (t-bombs at Brothers), goes home and pukes in the little hotel garbage can by the desk. The next day, he wakes up at 4:45 hungover as all hell and frantic about missing our 5:00 a.m. team bus. He throws his stuff together but can’t find his tooth. So he has to check, y’know? Nauseous and near-puking, he looks in the can and sees a glimmer of steel from the retainer of his front tooth. ….And plunges his hand in. GAG.}
*****
Sharks/Wingys
Last night the Detroit Red Wings blew a two-goal lead at home to the always clutch, unwaveringly relentless Joe Thornton and Patrick Marleau. You just can’t beat consistency when it comes from team leaders. (“…well you should, cause I’m layin’ it on pretty thick.”)
Great goal.
Frankly, Jimmy Howard let them down. I don’t care how many great saves he made over the course of the night – the Shark’s first tally in the dying seconds of the first period was a terrible, momentum-swinging moment, and the goal line sneaker is, as usual, frowned upon.
I swear to god, when it was 2-0 Wings I almost tweeted “Was there anyone out there who didn’t think the Wings were going to pump San Jose tonight?” And really, it still would’ve been a fair question. Didn’t we all think that the first game at the Joe was going to be an “oh yeahhhh, now I remember, the RED WINGS, right…” night?
But San Jose didn’t give up against a tough team in their home barn, and the big boys answered the bell when it was rung. If you’re a Bill Simmons reader, you know the value of them somehow having the “no one believed in us” factor (the same way the Coyotes did), despite being a one seed. That’s a dangerous combination, no?
Two things:
1) Sometimes when a team is down 3-0, you can pretty much stop watching the series. But with the reputations of these two teams (choking dogs, straight-up winners, respectively), doesn’t this kinda fit the formula for a series that could still get real scary, real quick, IF yaknowhatImean? I say the Red Wings win the next game handily, like, 4-1 or so, just to make even the most ardent Sharks supporter poop just a little.
2) In fairness, San Jose does look like the team who’ll be moving on, which makes me uber-excited for the Western Conference finals. Either series would be awesome (vs. Van or vs. Chi), because all three teams have fan bases and teams that can never seem to get over the hump, but deserve to. Looking into the future: I think I’d pick the Sharks to beat Chicago, but not Vancouver. I’ll explain when the time comes.
Pitt beats Montreal two-spit
Thus far, this series is only interesting for Penguins and Habs fans, which is probably somewhere near 50% of the total fans of the sport thanks to bandwagonners and traditionalists. Watching the Habs is like watching a cup-winning Devils team, only without the confidence.
And really, that’s it: Montreal is playing this well because they lack confidence (umm, and they’re smart), so that know they have to play the perfect team defensive game to have any hope. Whiiiiich they keep doing. So when they run into a hot (decent?) goalie, the mere 18 shots they’ve generated in two of the four games is simply not going to get it done, even with shutting down the Penguins high-flyin’ offense.
Sorry Habs fans, but you’ve got too much skill and talent on that team to be this boring. This isn’t who you are.
Last thought: How badly do you think Scott Gomez’s career highlight reel was squashed by being at his peak during “The Devils Years”? (Which is a memory that makes most hockey fans shudder). I may have said this before, but if I could pick any guy to carry the puck in on the powerplay, I’m going with him. He’s just so light on his skates, man.
*****
That’s all for today people. Join me at 1PM EST on Puck Daddy’s site for a playoff hockey chat. I’ll be saying things like “oh big time”, “but that’s just not true” and maybe even “arrrriba!” Don’t miss out.
The floor is now yours to discuss McCarty’s teeth.
Canada/Germany, America Cares, Easton Z Shock Helmet
Canada vs. Russia, the widely predicted gold medal game, has shown up wayyyy too early.
But still, aren’t you kind of glad it’s happening? If the Olympics are only every fourth year, you’d hate to go through the whole thing and not play the American and Russian squads, and sure enough, we’re getting that wish. What’s that saying? Watch what you wish for?? Seriously.
*****
Last nights rout versus Germany was just what the boys needed. No mental stress, let everybody feel good about where their offensive game is at (Joe Thornton and Rick Nash scored!), and have Luongo get back into the swing of things (tough couple goals against, really).
I’m sensing from blog reader reactions we’re all having fun scrutinizing each and every guy, especially the bubble ones, but it really wouldn’t be fair to say something like ”Niedermeyer really turned it around last night” when his brother could have played D in last nights game and been fine (but I will say that his breakaway goal was suspect, to say the least. A no-move, on-the-ice five-hole shot. Really, Greiss? Those stopped going in around the late 80′s).
I have to think when Babcock was making the lines, he had Russia in mind, not Germany, and was giving the guys a day to gel. Well, (I always wanna write “welp”, because that’s kinda how I say it, but I’m afraid people will think it’s a typo. Lets try it again, no typo)…. Welp, it all comes down to this: Lose and you’re out, and we’re playing a top three country in the world at the sport.
The bad news for them?
WE’RE A TOP ONE COUNTRY, RUSKI’S, HERE WE COOOMMMMEEEE!
(Legitimate question: Is “Ruski” derogatory? I hope I didn’t just write some horrible slur. If I did, my bad, it was ignorance not hate.)
*****
You know what the US win over Canada has done for all of us? Made the rivalry better, for one simple reason: the reaction to the win showed that American fans actually do care about hockey (or at least Canada vs. US hockey).
The common reaction to Canada’s 2002 gold in the US was “well, whatever, we win everything else and don’t care about hockey anyways”.
“We’re a football country” (or baseball, depending on who you ask).
Whatever the response, it was usually some derivative of “meh”. But the second the buzzer went that solidified the US win over their northern neighbors, the true colours came out. Non-sports news shows, MTV, you name it, the Americans were right jazzed about that win. It was great to see and hear, not only because Americans loving hockey is GREAT for the game, but you always want your opponent to care.
So now we know. The next time a loss hurts the US, don’t turn to the other sports and not-caredom. You clearly do. So if your hearts get broken in the next week, just say so. Say it hurt, and you’ll get ‘em next time.
You lost the tool of “meh”, and that’s fun for everyone.
*****
Easton has come out with their new “Z Shock” helmet that’s “lighter than a cup of coffee”, as the tag line goes. They sent them out to a bunch of media people for reviews and a little publicity, and I happened to be included in that group. I gave it a go at rec hockey last night (by the way, we’re one win away from league champ status, weeeee), so here’s a review:
First things first, it’s light. Crazy light. And I was thinking, well, I don’t get hit much in rec hockey, so I could definitely sacrifice a little protection for a lighter lid. But as it turns out, the helmet has better protection statistics than every other current helmet out there. So they got that goin’ for ‘em.
As for looks, it’s pretty sharp. Nothing can compare to the low-pro look of the old Bauer 4000′s for my money, but style-wise, this one is as nice as the RBK’s most guys wear now. I’m pretty sure Iginla is wearing it, actually.
The ear pieces snap out easy and quick, so you don’t have to look like Crosby for long, and like all new lids, is adjustable in size without needing a screwdriver.
Long story short, thanks to Easton for sending me the helmet. I’m pretty sure it’s gonna take over the number one spot in my helmet rotation, based purely on being comfortable and really, really light.
They’re comparing it to being as revolutionary as when they came out with the Synergy sticks, which is hardly true, but they did make a good product here, as Easton always does. If you happen to see one, at least pick it up and give it a look. After all – it’s lighter than a cup of coffee.
Top Ten Canadians in the Game
NHL.com lists the ten best Canadians in the game today (in order) as:
1. Sidney Crosby 2. Martin Brodeur 3. Jarome Iginla 4. Marc-Andre Fleury 5. Chris Pronger 6. Ryan Getzlaf 7. Rick Nash 8. Roberto Luongo 9. Joe Thornton 10. Vincent Lecavalier
Though not ridiculous, it’s a tad nostalgic. Chris Pronger is the fifth best Canadian hockey player alive today? Don’t take the following as not liking any of the above guys, I just thought I’d mix in my own thoughts, and hear some of yours (okay, you can take it as me not liking Pronger).

Oops, I'm really, really good.
{First, I’m finally impressed with a US hockey team, which makes me a tad nervous for Canada. It was a hassle when every country in Europe starting getting really good (go back to producing bums with eight “i’s” in their name, Finland), but now the US? That’s annoying.
Names like Parise, Stastny, Kane, Kessel, Kessler, Ryan and Booth point to a pretty strong future. Young, fast and a talented — all of ‘em.}
But back to our Canadian top ten.
1. Sidney is a given.
But I just can’t give Martin Brodeur the title of #2. This is always a tough point to make, because folks can drag up stats (career GAA of amazing-point-five, save percentage is ninetywhatever-point-awesome), but come on. I could drag up Bobby Orr’s amazing numbers too, but you wouldn’t want him (the 61 year old him) starting at defense in 2010, would you? Brodeur’s great, but on the downslope of his career (and never exactly been known for his fitness).
Marty has become a staple of Canadian big game hockey and I love him to death for that. But, Canada should probably move on. Cam Ward didn’t crack the NHL.com top ten, but wouldn’t you like to see him wearing a Team Canada jersey at the Olympics? It’s not like Carolina’s teams have been stacked, but he’s made them successful – this guy is a big game goalie too.

Oops, I'm really, really good.
Our best Canadian goalies today are Luongo (what goalie would have won a cup backstopping the teams he has? Don’t give me that argument), Cam Ward, and Marc-Andre Fleury (who I’ve always liked, despite the fact that everyone in Canada hated the disappointment he “was” before June of this year).
One – that’s right, ONE – defenseman made that list, and it was Pronger. More than taking away from Chris, who admittedly is still in the upper echelon of defenseman (hanging on… losing… grip… must… hang on), I have to give credit to two other guys, Mike Green of Washington, and Shea Weber of Nashville.
I got more texts from hockey-playing friends watching NHL playoff games last year about Mike Green than anyone else. He does some amazingly nifty little things that make a big difference. To be a scorer in the NHL today is tough to do, but this guys’ stat-line from last year as a defenseman was 31 goals, 42 assists for 73 points… in 68 games.
Oh, and he’s 24. His defensive game has gotten better every year, and will continue to.
As ridiculous as it seems now, I was Shea Weber’s instructor at Dave Roy’s “Edge of Excellence” hockey school. I was 18, and Shea was 15. He was probably bigger than me by three inches then and just under twice as fast. I made a huge difference in his life.
“Yep, you’re doing it right. Yep. That was good. Uh-huh.”
At this point, he’s not even freaking human. Punishingly physical, with a booming slapper and great foot speed, I bet there’s a lot of GM’s who’d take him over Green. He’s Pronger 2.1 – the next edition. Toting less lumbering largeness (a mere 6’3″ 210), he carries his size more like Duncan Keith than a Todd Bertuzzi, and is frighteningly better every time I see him play.

"Hi I'm Jon. I'm allowed to drink this year. Neato."
Oh, and he’s 24.
I think a list of our top ten Canadian players today needs to pay closer attention to the way the game is being played now. Vinnie Lecavalier is a great player, and plenty physical to boot. But remember how it looked when the international teams were bombing around and we were trying to Eric Lindros/Keith Primeau them into the ground? We couldn’t catch them.
Vinnie isn’t that big slug type of player; I just think the new type of goal scorer is more evasive than invasive. Doesn’t Jonathan Toews strike you as a more effective guy in today’s game? The guys scored 34 times as a 21 year old captain last year. He’s following in Lecavaliers footsteps as the young captain, but is already trouncing the numbers Vinnie put up at that age.
So without further ado… My list:
1. Sidney Crosby
2. Ryan Getzlaf
3. Jarome Iginla
4. Roberto Luongo
5. Rick Nash
6. Mike Green
7. Jonathan Toews
8. Joe Thornton
9. Shea Weber
10. Cam Ward
I’d put those guys out against any country, any day. (Wait, except Russia. Not sure what they’re doing over there, but it’s starting to resemble cheating).












I'm a hockey player turned writer. After playing for Alaska Anchorage in the WCHA (NCAA), I carried on with an NHL tryout (New York Islanders in 2007) before spending a couple seasons in the AHL/ECHL (last year was 2008-09). My father, Bob Bourne, won four Stanley Cups with the Islanders in the '80's, as did my fiancee's dad, Clark Gillies. I'm now the web editor for theScore's hockey blog "Backhand Shelf."