On The Bruins, and Game-Breakers
New Hockey Primetime: What factors into motivation aside from winning and cash? (Haven’t even finished it yet, let alone submitted. Gimme a hot sec, will ya?
)
*****
I had a little twitter conversation with the esteemed “Haggs” (Joe Haggerty) today, the gent who covers the Bruins (and Boston sports in general) so well. He is also kind of a fan of the Bruins, and I support that – you always get better quality work from people who care.
He expressed the idea that the East is wide open for the Bruins to take. He’s almost right, save for Philly. The other top teams are plenty scary, but they all have some minor deficiencies. I just think Philly’s team might be good enough to overcome the inexperienced goaltending.
Still, it brought me to the Bruins roster, and I gave it a good once over, in hopes of finding a hole to reply to Haggs with after he picked apart the other top contenders (Philly: “goaltending.” Tampa: “lack of playoff experience after Vinny/St.Louis.” Washington: “picking up Boston’s castoffs – Wideman, Sturm – doesn’t wow me.” Pittsburgh: “No Crosby/Malkin.”)
It was damn hard to dig up any weakness - that roster is insanely deep. I scanned down it from the top to find the first laugher of a player, and there wasn’t one. My eyes stopped on Adam McQuaid (Darth Quaider, apparently), which is stupid, because it turns out he’s like, first in the NHL in +/- at +27. Hardly a “laugher,” I just hadn’t noticed him before.
Anyway, the only thing I have is this: They don’t really have a game-breaker. And my regular readers knowwwww how I loves me some game-breakers. Never been a fan of “scoring by committee” …which is still about ten notches behind “goaltending by committee” on the Ideas That Won’t Work list.
The reason I think a team needs at least a game-breaker or two to win is fairly understandable: in close games, defense tightens up, they’re on high alert, and they’re trying their hardest. There’s more clutching and grabbing, and it gets more difficult for a middle of the road scorer to beat someone one-on-one and break the game open. Ain’t nobody sleeping. Oftentimes, these close games just drag out until overtime or a “bad goal.”
Thing is, that you have to score bad goals to win close games is another old-school misconception. It happens occassionally, but look – when Patrick Kane juked Kimmo Timonen to score the Stanley Cup game winning goal in overtime, that wasn’t a bad goal. The shot itself should’ve been stopped, but I’m pretty sure there isn’t a player on Boston’s roster could have got themselves in a position to score that “bad goal” - he got the puck flat-footed on the half-wall. He made about 55 shoulder shimmies before getting the shot off. Big time players come through in big time moments.Last years Cup champs: Toews and Kane.
The year before: Crosby and Malkin.
The year before: Datsyuk and Zetterberg.
Before that: Getzlaf and Perry.
It’s just the way the NHL playoffs go (I stopped short of Carolina who really only had Eric Staal, but the one before that is right back to Tampa with Lecavalier and St. Louis).
Now, that’s not to say the Bruins can’t or won’t win the Cup. I’ve picked them to go to the Finals since the season began. I really like their team. I was just trying to find a weakness.
I’m not sure Bergeron….Lucic? is going to cut it. Krejci? Their team’s strength is that I could play the Bergeron and ??? game for almost the entire length of their roster (the weakness might be that I’m pretty sure Bergeron doesn’t even qualify for the type of guy I mean). But still…Horton? Peverly? It’s a deep team, with a nice touch of grit. Kaberle was just the addition they needed too.
I’m not sayin’, I’m just sayin’: if there’s anything I feel that could catch up to them it’s their ability to score goals……I say about the team who’s 5th in the NHL in goals-per-game, after a 6-0-0 road trip, the first since the Bobby Orr era.
(Remember, the argument isn’t that the Bruins can’t score – it’s wondering if they have a guy who can do it consistently in the big moments of playoff games, AKA a game-breaker. Think back to the year the Pens won – Crosby single-handedly won the Conference Finals, then Malkin the Finals.)
Anyway, that’s the best I could do at poking a hole in the theory that the Bruins are going to mow over the rest of the East. You on board with that, or is there another reason we won’t see them in the Stanley Cup Final?
{Note: please refrain from just typing the name of your favourite team without evidence or argument.}
*****
Happy humpday. The wifancee is trying out Zumba today. Thoughts?
Game One Thoughts: Canucks/Kings, Caps ‘n’ Habs
Thanks to the wonders of DVR and an early night from the fiancee, I actually got to fully watch two of last nights three playoff games. For a single TV household, too much of my weeknight TV is taken up by horrors like Dancing With The Stars, or the slightly less horrible Biggest Loser.
I’m hoping that ups the quality of today’s expert analysis.
Canucks/Kings
ZOMG thisgamewassogreat. (see, expert stuff)
Really, it’s been a rare treat for me to get to watch the Canucks play this year, so I really soaked it in. Alliteratively speaking, those stupid Sedins are so sick it’s scary. There was the recent scandal revealed by Intent To Blow – follow that link for a great laugh - but aside from that, these guys played a near flawless game last night.
A lot of people in the world have crazy sick hands. But to combine those skills (and 361 degree vision …..Yep, twins have an extra degree) with size and work ethic is breathtaking. I enjoyed watching them work their magic, easily as much as I enjoy watching Crosby or Ovechkin - just in a different way.
When watching Sid and Ovie, you get the sense that they might make any player look silly at any moment. Maybe two players. With Daniel and Henrik, it’s a more reserved, make-all-six-opponents-look-stupid-at-once quality.
Then there’s Mikael Samuelsson, the under-the-radar dude that may be the best value-per-dollar in the league. They have him for two more years after this one, at $2.5 million per, and the guy doesn’t seem to even be aware of how good he is. Canucks fans do.
But that’s enough Canucks gushing, especially from a BC boy who never claimed to be much of a ‘nucks fan (though as far as Canadian teams go, I’ll take them first, thanks).
The Kings deserve plenty of love too. This game could have easily gone the other way, had it not been for some fine overtime goaltending from the man everyone loves to bash, Roberto Luongo. This guy is like Ovechkin, in that the second he underachieves, 15% of hockey fans can barely get the word “SEE!” out of their mouth fast enough.
{Though Down Goes Brown put Ovy’s start in the best 140 characters yet: “Now that the Vancouver/LA game is underway, everyone but Chicago, Nashville and Ovechkin have started their playoffs.”}
The Kings moved the puck nicely on the powerplay, got solid play from their young D studs (minus some d-zone lapses), and aren’t to be taken lightly going forward.
By the way, I’m so sick of the old adage that ugly goals win overtime games. 100 pretty goals will go in over 100 overtimes, then the second an ugly one crosses the line, everyones like “yup, that’s the way it always goes.” No. No it’s not.
The Canucks had great pressure, lots of in-zone movement from their forwards, and simply turned the Kings around in their own end. Great pass, great shot. Nothin’ ugly about that.
*****
Capitals/Habs
Damn, already wrong on this prediction.
The startling thing about this game wasn’t that the Habs got it done in overtime, it was that they didn’t win in regulation. I mean, honestly.
The second half of the second period looked like the worlds longest powerplay for Montreal. My line that “if you have the puck on offense all the time, you never have to play defense” is no less true, but it requires the having of the puck. When your offense isn’t present, and you rely on your offense to be your defense…. damn. Ug. Ly. Stuff.
Cammalleri’s top corner shot on the first goal was ridiculous. It would go in on any of the leagues 30 goalies, even if they had time to set to it. Good lord was that rifled. And actually, Plecanec’s OT winner was more than decent too – the top guys probably flag it down, but the point is, you can’t fault Theodore for the loss. The defenseman’s gap on that play was so poor it was on welfare. He was damn near face-off dot deep while Plecanec crossed the blueline.
You know who you can fault on Montreal’s game tying goal though? The ever-talented, oft-Bourne-defended Mike Green. Damnit, son, D up.
Though I still think the Caps win the next four, last nights game didn’t feel like Montreal escaped with a road win. They beat the Caps, straight up.
And as for Ovy’s no-show? Settle down, world. He’ll be juuuust fine.
*****
Didn’t catch Boston vs. Buffalo, but saw it was, as predicted, a 2-1 Buffalo win. I got one right!
I’ll Take Potpourri For A Thousand, Alex
Not that my blog is particularly focused in the first place, but I’m due to unload a whole crapload of half-baked thoughts. Some may be on the same page as you, some may be a complete waste of seconds of your life, but hey – I’m pretty sure it was the variable interval schedule of rewards that got the rats coming back the most in the Skinner box, so it only makes sense. Start hitting the lever, my pretties….
*****
My BlackBerry only allows me to send 160 characters in a text. Hey phone, you’re not Twitter. My archaic, older machines used to let me go long and send it in two parts, but my new one won’t? ….At least I don’t have to use AT&T like iPhonies, I guess….
*****
The NHL Network did interviews with Sidney Crosby and Ryan Miller post-Olympics, and largely focused on the final goal. I realize Ryan Miller’s head is shaped like an ice cream cone, but did we really have to sit him down and give him those few extra licks? The guy was all over him, like the last goal was a Miller meltdown. Hockey plays kinda happen quickly there, Tom Brokaw.
*****
Crosby turned down the chance to do the Top Ten on Letterman, as he has before. My guess for “why?” is because there’s nothing more patronizing than reciting jokes about hockey written by people who have zero idea about the sport to begin with. Okay, team, we need ten jokes involving sticks, ice and gold. Let the hilarity begin.
*****
I used to chat with my mom after a close playoff game I was in, and she’d say that at times she was near a complete and utter emotional meltdown …yet I never was. It occurred to me after the Canada/US final that Mom is right – when you care about the result of a game, it’s far easier (stress-wise) to be playing than watching.
*****
Let’s bring this picture into focus: Nobody is ever allowed to say “eye-hand” in reference to “hand-eye” coordination again, okay? Good talk.
*****
Commentators always give goalies shit for looking behind them like they’re shaky, which they might be. But if it’s your goalie, aren’t you glad he’s doing it? If he isn’t certain he has full possession, isn’t it kinda like crossing the street…. no harm in checking? If you aren’t sure, damn straight have a glance, and sooner than later. I don’t need a puck limping across my goal line, thanks.
*****
I have a petty grudge against American Olympian Ryan Suter for calling me a “bender” in college a half-dozen times, so I’d like to take this opportunity to extend a retro-active, Canadian “ha-ha” to him (said like Nelson from the Simpsons) on his crushing overtime defeat. What’s that you say? He’s rich, in the NHL, and an Olympic silver medalist? Touché.
*****
Best backhand(s) in the NHL: Patrick Kane, Evgeni Malkin, Henrik Zetterberg. Come accept your awards.
*****
I’m stoked about The Marriage Ref, even though it has nothing to do with marriage. Really, it’s just a topic for three really funny people to BS about. Consider my DVR set.
*****
For this years trendy, surprise Stanley Cup champion pick, I predict people predicting San Jose. Everyone knows you’re not supposed to, based on their past playoff failures. Thus, it’s a talented team that people shouldn’t pick – the perfect formula for all us talking heads to take as a “shocker that might come true”. The goal isn’t to be right – hell, being right in the majority might actually be worse than being wrong. So here comes everyones attempts at “right in the minority”. See, look what a great hockey mind I am!
*****
As I’m fairly tall, and somehow I shrink all my shirts up over time, I think I see how old men end up wearing their pants under their nipples. Shirts miraculously get shorter, so the pants gotta come up to compensate. I’m like the Hardy Boys, knocking out one mystery at a time.
*****
In Tiger’s apology speech, everytime he started to tear up, he put it on lock and got it together. Isn’t that the ultimate testament to the guy’s mental ability? To just put the kibosh on tears and re-focus? Impressive.
*****
And last, if you feel like reading a real column I wrote, you can check out my thoughts on why it’s harder to score towards the end of the season, for USA Today. I think that’s enough mind-puke for one day. Happy Tuesday. Not the biggest day in the sports world. You may have spend time with your family today. ….Ugh.
The Conn Smythe, a Plug and a Kobe
Heyyy, the Pengy’s finally won one!
The saddest part of watching them win was admitting that they just aren’t the better team. I so badly wanted them to be. Sigh… But, at least there’s hope.
I was so convinced Crosby was the Penguins Conn Smythe guy after the conference finals it was silly. I figured, even if Malkin steps it up in a big way in the finals it wasn’t going to equal Crosby’s contributions to how far they’ve advanced. Now, it’s looking a little dicier.
What about the Wings? Zetterberg or Franzen? Or… Osgood? Back to back Zetterberg’s right? The last time I can remember an offensive player playing defense that exceptionally was Fedorov in his heyday, also for the Red Wings.
[polldaddy poll=1675957]
On the vacation front, there’s good news in regards to our Hockey Greats Fantasy Camp this year. Aside from having guys like Dale Hawerchuk, Bryan Trottier, Clark Gillies, Billy Smith, Cliff Ronning, Dave Semenko and many others locked up, we reached a long term agreement with the beautiful lakeside resort “The Cove” on the Westside of Kelowna BC. The camp wouldn’t be the same without that setting, so I want to give a major thank you to them for partnering with us.
With agreements and sponsorships, we’ve been able to cut entry down to $3000 (with sponsorship packages ranging from $150 to $20,000). We provide the ice time, cover transportation in Kelowna, provide lots of free gear, your resort suite, a round of golf, breakfasts and appy’s, an afternoon on a houseboat and other extras.
We’re working on bringing Trevor Linden into the fold, and next year we have Kelly Hrudey committed to hosting. Signing up this year also affords you a discount on next years entry. Contact me if you’re interested in being involved August 5th to the 8th in Kelowna BC at jtbourne@gmail.com – there’s actvities, accomodations and entertainment in a relaxed environment for every guest.
Sorry about the shameless plug – I just really love the event we’re running out here.
I need to mention something else before I call today over (PS, plugging that made me feel like Vince at ShamWow. “ShamWow, it’ll have ya sayin’ wow every time”). I’m watching the Spike Lee documentary “Kobe Doin’ Work”.
What is this guy’s deal?
It’s so awkward watching him justify every play and decision throughout the whole documentary. It just seems so forced. I’m not sure why I still get the vibe that the guy is insecure. What does he want, more money, fame? I’ve tried so hard to like the guy. He’s A-Rod awkward. God, what a chotch.
And lastly, my latest The Hockey News entry on slumping will be up in the next day or two. I’ll post the link when it’s up! Go Pens!
Aw, Sidney. You're A Good Boy.
I figured it out Canada. I know why hockey isn’t being embraced by the rest of the world (read: the United States). Personality. Thank God Ovechkin showed up, he’s given our game a chance. The problem started with great ambassadors to the game like Gretzky. Sure, the Gretzky trade to L.A. was probably the single biggest influence in bringing the game to Americans, but it wasn’t his playing or his personality that damped enthusiasm. It was his level of class.
It didn’t do harm in his era, because there was still a volume of loud mouth entertainers playing at the same time (Tiger Williams used to ride his stick. Actually. That happened). The problem became that kids grew up idolizing Wayne and in turn were speaking with respect about their opponent and modestly about their own contributions. I respect Gretzky’s public persona, and wish we could sell that game to the US without a little unnecessary flair, but I’m not sure it’s possible. They love that stuff.
Kids wanted to be Gretter. And our parents wanted the same. Whaaattt a wonnnderful example he set. Cordial, polite and professional, he simply achieved the highest goal: Win. Facts and polite smiles at every turn. Other leagues have their biggest stars saying the most obscene things and creating sub-plots fit for theatre (Slapshot reference: how about the implied storyline that never develops any farther then “He’s been living in semi-seclusion in Northern Quebec, Andre “The Poodle” Lessard…”). These sub-plots are everywhere in hockey, but they exist behind closed doors. Frankly, the media isn’t savvy enough to dig them up. I think the guys covering the NFL wiretap the room or something.
But take Sidney Crosby, Gretzky’s protege. What a player. Whether you think he’s the best, or a baby, or whatever, you can’t deny that he’s good. But he’s the last thing the NHL needed. A superstar saying the right thing. Sean Avery wasn’t a fair representation of the NHL (though he was of himself), but, man. ESPN couldn’t get enough of this guy. I literally didn’t know Mats Sundin played for the Canucks until I got home on the weekend. But I knew how many pinstripes were on the suit Avery was wearing at his internship for Vogue. I knew his dating history, his slightly effeminate manner for an agitator, and could have diagnosed him with a psychological condition.
If Mike Comrie would say”I could care less that we lost, I’m going to Hannah Montana, er, Hillary Duffs birthday party tonight”, like he’s actually thinking, people might follow our game a bit closer. Everyone in America cannot wait to hear what Terrell Owens says after he finishes a game with 1 catch for 8 yards. It’s a soap opera.
(I enjoy both the hat, and that the clip helps my case at the start, in the middle, and to finish)
And thats whats lacking in our game. We don’t need constant rule fixes, highlighted pucks or outdoor games (but those are great, keep those going). The teams and the league need to stop worrying so much about bulletin board material. You know, those apparently motivating comments like “The Islanders defence sucks” before you play the Islanders. You know what? The Islanders defence does suck. Just because they know that you think it, doesn’t mean they can stop anything.
This black-balling of flair from the game may be the NHL’s biggest turn-off, including Gary Bettman. Coaches love to warn their team about the evils of disrespecting your opponent in the media and how it’s going to give them fuel. It’s just not true. Plus, you can respect your opponent and still say something interesting and relevant into the microphone can’t you? Hockey definitely leads major sports in regurgitated answers. Phrases like “gut check” are nauseasting. I used to think it was because hockey players aren’t that smart (they aren’t), but I reeeeeaaalllly don’t think basketball or football players finished with higher GPA’s. But it’s just not necessary to be so wary of what we say. Never once in my career have a I thought “I can’t believe Steve Defenceman doesn’t think our team can score. I’m gonna score so many more goals now to prove him wrong”. I was already trying to score.
Please, coaches, Gary Bettman, team captains… loosen up. Let the fans see a little of that passion, and a few of those storylines that stay buried. I promise it will be more fun if they notice that right from the drop of the puck #17 has been clipping #22 in the mouth with his elbow everytime they line up for a face off. I promise if will be more fun if more people notice your game. Enough Sidney. You’re a good boy. You’re a good boy.
Okay, maybe we could use a liiiittle censorship.
I haven’t seen an NHL highlight in the US since that clip. Loosen up boys.







I'm a hockey player turned writer. After playing for Alaska Anchorage in the WCHA (NCAA), I carried on with an NHL tryout (New York Islanders in 2007) before spending a couple seasons in the AHL/ECHL (last year was 2008-09). My father, Bob Bourne, won four Stanley Cups with the Islanders in the '80's, as did my fiancee's dad, Clark Gillies. I'm now the web editor for theScore's hockey blog "Backhand Shelf."