Comments on: I’ll Take Potpourri For A Thousand, Alex

By: SDC

SDC — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:24:36 +0000

I was counting Jerry as a guest (he was sitting in the guest chair, and won’t appear every week), but i guess you weren’t. I didn’t like Eva either, I only said Kelly was better than expected. Your math, your scenario, your results, your opinion… ok, you’re entitled. Surely no one wants another Canucks fans debate…

By: Neil

Neil — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:11:14 +0000

So Dave, there’s been four guests so far, and two of them were Kelly Ripa and Eva Longoria….. my math checks out.

By: jtbourne

jtbourne — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:36:24 +0000

Haha, vek, I love the tone of your proposal. I hate the idea of going 4-on-4 like, for reals, but I love the slice of pizza. I also love some 3-on-3 overtime, it’s the tits. I also hate red communists, even though I’m a socialist Canadian. I’ll formally submit your ideas to Bettman to see what he thinks. Oh, he just wrote me back. He says the only change is that the league is gonna expand in the south. Kentucky and Mississippi just got franchises, thanks to you egging Bettman on.

By: vek

vek — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:43:31 +0000

Random hockey thought:

4 on 4 is so much more exciting than 5 on 5, its ridiculous. And it has the advantage of eliminating the Matt Cookes and all the other marginal goons from the rosters of the league, and gives the Mike Richards(eseses) of the league more game-critical things to do on the ice. The only people who could possibly hate this idea would be the NHLPA, 90 year old hockey traditionalists, and red communists.

And then for overtime, we could go 3 on 3. Even more ridiculously awesome. 15 – 2 on 1 chances in ten minutes, guaranteed, or the whole rink attendance gets a slice of pizza.

Even Phoenix would be successful with these changes.

By: minnesotagirl71

minnesotagirl71 — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:37:16 +0000

Congrats on nine years to Mr and Mrs C! Love it when a relationship can handle a little pro-athlete/rock star/actor lust!

I’m married and think the Marriage Ref is a really bad show. Saw the first episode and thought “Really – that’s all there is?” I can laugh at and take sides on my own and my friends relationship squabbles, but to watch other people’s on TV? Sorry – need a little more substance with my humor. I think drinking before the show would make me like it even less….

By: ms.conduct

ms.conduct — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:02:12 +0000

Hahaha! I love it. I heart Jerry, too, but I swear he looks like a very bored, rich man whose wife said, “Go get a job” and NBC said, “Here’s this dumb idea we have” and he said, “Why not?”

He should be the host, frankly, and then it would be epic. EPIC!

BTW, 9 year wedding anniversary today and I don’t know a single thing we’d go on that show about. I’m NOT asking Mr. C if he’d say the same. Ignorance is bliss.

By: SDC

SDC — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:34:58 +0000

50% ??? There’s only been 6 guests so far, and Jerry was on twice! Tina Fey was good, Baldwin also good, Kelly Ripa was……actually not that bad, and the write off was Eva Longoria. The Bourne-Cunning Alliance stands– Corbett and Ms. Conduct, you two are out of your minds. All things Jerry!

By: jtbourne

jtbourne — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:03:50 +0000

Haha, or maybe I should NOT drink when I watch it? That could be it.

By: Neil

Neil — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:41:14 +0000

LOL
I’m in the same boat Ms.conduct, I don’t have anything against a show about marriage/relationships/whatever (I’ve been with my lady for almost 8 years), but so far 50% of the special guests have made me nauseous and the jokes seem a bit…. Leno….
Maybe I should drink when I watch it, that turned me into a fan of Jersey Shore, which I’m pretty sure is the worst show on tv.

By: jtbourne

jtbourne — Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:10:14 +0000

Fact is, my fave internet friend may be you, Ms. C, and damn sure one of my fave non-internet friends is Neil, which leads me to this conclusion:

You’re both dumb idiots with bad taste. All things Seinfeld rule.